Graves v. Benton County Sheriff's Office Second Shift E-Pod Officers & Superiors et al, No. 5:2017cv05009 - Document 9 (W.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case WITHOUT PREJUDICE; see order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 14, 2017. (rg)

Download PDF
Graves v. Benton County Sheriff's Office Second Shift E-Pod Officers & Superiors et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION WESLEY W. GRAVES PLAINTIFF v CASE NO. 5:17-CV-05009 BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SECOND SHIFT E-POD OFFICERS & SUPERIORS; DEPUTY KELL; DEPUTY WILMETH; SERGEANT DWYER; CORPORAL KEMP; and INMATE CHRISTOPHER THORNSBERRY DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER This is a civil rights case filed by the Plaintiff under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Plaintiff pr-oceeds in forma pauperis and pro se. Plaintiff is incarcerated at the Benton County Detention Center. By order (Doc. 3) entered on January 10, 2017 , Plaintiff was advised that he could not name as Defendants all officers and supervisors on second shift. Instead , he was advised that he must name as Defendants only those individuals who were personally involved in violating his federal constitutional rights. Plaintiff was given until January 17, 2017, to respond to the order. Plaintiff did not respond to the order. On March 13, 2017 , a show cause order (Doc. 8) was entered. Plaintiff was given until April 3, 2017 , to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to his failure to prosecute this action and his failure to obey the order of the Court. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the show cause order. He has not requested an extension of time to respond . No mail has been returned as undeliverable. For these Dockets.Justia.com reasons , this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey the orders of tu. Court. Fed . R. Civ. P. 41 IT IS SO ORDERED on this I~ day of April , 20 7.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.