Walker v. Kirk et al, No. 5:2016cv00206 - Document 85 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting the 74 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and granting in part and denying in part defendants' 64 motion for summary judgment. The motion is granted as to defendants CCS and Floss, and denied as to defendants Hubbard, Kirk, and Bazzel. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/17/2017. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walker v. Kirk et al Doc. 85 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ANDREW WALKER, ADC #118512 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:16CV00206-JLH-JTK KIRK, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part, as to defendants CCS and Floss, and DENIED as to defendants Hubbard, Kirk, and Bazzel. Document #64. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED this 17th day of May, 2017. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
