Feuget v. Kelley, No. 5:2015cv00388 - Document 24 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 19 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 1 Feuget's petition for wit of habeas corpus, and denying the relief requested. A certificate of appealability will not be granted because Feuget has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/7/2017. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Feuget v. Kelley Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL FEUGET v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 5:15CV00388 BSM WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 19] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been received along with petitioner Michael Feuget’s objections and respondent Wendy Kelley’s response to Feuget’s objections. See Doc. Nos. 22, 23. After careful consideration of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Feuget’s petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 is dismissed with prejudice, and the relief sought is denied. A certificate of appealability will not be granted because Feuget has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of July 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
