Winston et al v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al, No. 2:2013cv00104 - Document 51 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER granting 50 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendants' 39 and 42 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/29/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
Winston et al v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al Doc. 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CHARLES A. WINSTON ADC #84733 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:13-cv-104-DPM-JJV CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC.; JOE E. HUGHES, Physician, CMS; GERALDINE G. CAMPBELL, APN, CMS; J ANITIA STELL, Regional Ombubsman, CMS; and WENDY KELLY, Deputy Director, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 50, adopted. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Defendants' motions for summary judgment, NQ 39 & 42, are granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. f United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.