Stafford v. Ryan et al, No. 4:2009cv00363 - Document 28 (D. Ariz. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 Report and Recommendations. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 10/30/12. (LMF)

Download PDF

Stafford v. Ryan et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 6 Warren Frank Stafford, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 Charles Ryan, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-09-363-TUC-DCB ORDER 12 Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on October 9, 13 2012, recommending that the District Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 14 dismiss the action with prejudice. 15 notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 16 U.S.C. §636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have 17 been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not 18 be addressed by the Court. A copy was sent to all parties on October 9, 2012, 19 The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows: 20 IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation 21 (Doc. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and 22 conclusions of law. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is 24 DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter 25 separately. 26 DATED this 30th day of October, 2012. 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.