Jewell v. Countrywide Home Loans Incorporated et al
Filing
16
ORDER that Plaintiff shall provide notice to Defendants of the pending motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 12) before the Court takes any action on the motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in responding to the motion for temporary restraining order, Defendants shall address the issues raised in Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 10-15215 (9th Cir. June 23, 2011). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 06/30/11. (ESL)
<![CDATA[
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; BAC)
Home Loan Servicing LP; Mortgage)
Electronic Registration Services, Inc.;)
Recontrust Company, NA; Bank of New)
)
York Mellon,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Renee Jewell,
No. CV 11-8042-PCT-JAT
ORDER
17
18
The Court has reviewed the third amended complaint and finds that Plaintiff has
19
sufficiently pleaded jurisdiction. Thus, the Court will take no further action regarding
20
jurisdiction. This conclusion is without prejudice to Defendants raising any jurisdictional
21
issue that they deem appropriate.
22
Plaintiff has also moved for a temporary restraining order, seeking to enjoin
23
Defendants and a state court judge from moving forward with a forcible detainer action.
24
Doc. 12. Plaintiff has offered no reason why the Court should consider the request for
25
temporary restraining order without giving notice to Defendants. Accordingly, the Court will
26
take no action on the motion for temporary restraining order until Plaintiff either serves
27
Defendants, or gives Defendants some other form of notice regarding the temporary
28
1
restraining order.1 If Plaintiff gives Defendants notice other than formal service of the
2
temporary restraining order, Plaintiff shall file a notice with this Court indicating exactly how
3
and when notice was given to Defendants.2
4
Based on the foregoing,
5
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide notice to Defendants of the pending
6
motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 12) before the Court takes any action on the
7
motion.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in responding to the motion for temporary
9
restraining order, Defendants shall address the issues raised in Chapman v. Deutsche Bank
10
11
National Trust Co., No. 10-15215 (9th Cir. June 23, 2011).
DATED this 30th day of June, 2011.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
2
27
28
The Court reached this same conclusion in the Order of June 2, 2011.
Although Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 requires only that notice be given of
a request for a temporary restraining order, Plaintiff must still serve Defendants with the
summons and third amended complaint within the time limits set forth in Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 4(m).
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
