United States of America v. $10,067.00 in US Currency et al
Filing
17
ORDER denying as moot 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and granting 16 Plaintiff's Motion for entry of judgment. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants as follows: JUDGMENT is entered for the United States and against defendants, the sum of $10,067 and the vehicle represented by the substitute res bond in the amount of $1,100, and against claimants Alicia Jimenez and Argimiro Gonzalez, and their minor son, C.G., and all others who have not filed a claim and answer in this action. The costs of this action subsequently taxed by the clerk shall be incorporated as a portion of this judgment. See PDF document for details. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/14/11.(LSP)
<![CDATA[
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
$10,067.00 in U.S. Currency; Chevrolet)
Tahoe, VIN #3GCEC28K2SM123250, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
United States of America,
No. CV-10-2059-PHX-FJM
ORDER
16
17
Plaintiff filed this civil action in rem to enforce the provision of 31 U.S.C. § 5332(c)
18
for the forfeiture of property involved in a violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5332(a), or conspiracy
19
to commit such a violation. We now have before us plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery
20
(doc. 13) and motion for entry of judgment (doc. 16).
21
Claimants Alicia Jimenez and Argimiro Gonzalez initially filed a claim and answer,
22
but then subsequently withdrew them. (Doc. 15). The withdrawal of the claim and answer
23
renders the plaintiff’s motion to compel moot. Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING
24
plaintiff’s motion to compel on grounds of mootness. (Doc. 13).
25
Plaintiff has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the sum of $10,067
26
and the vehicle represented by the substitute res bond in the amount of $1,100 were property
27
involved in a violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5332(a), or a conspiracy to commit such a violation,
28
1
resulting in the forfeiture of property involved pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5332(c). In addition,
2
the vehicle is property involved in a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 512 and is therefore also subject
3
to forfeiture under that statute. Accordingly, it is ORDERED GRANTING plaintiff’s motion
4
for entry of judgment. (Doc. 16).
5
6
The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants as
follows:
7
JUDGMENT is entered for the United States and against defendants, the sum of
8
$10,067 and the vehicle represented by the substitute res bond in the amount of $1,100, and
9
against claimants Alicia Jimenez and Argimiro Gonzalez, and their minor son, C.G., and all
10
others who have not filed a claim and answer in this action. The defendant currency and the
11
substitute res bond are ordered forfeited to the United States pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5332(c)
12
and 18 U.S.C. § 512 and shall be disposed of according to law by the Customs and Border
13
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
14
Pursuant to Rule 54, Fed. R. Civ. P., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1918, 1920 and 1921, costs of
15
this action shall be taxed as determined by the clerk of the court upon the filing by plaintiff
16
of a bill of costs. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days from entry of judgment within which to
17
file a bill of costs. The costs of this action subsequently taxed by the clerk shall be
18
incorporated as a portion of this judgment.
19
DATED this 14th day of June, 2011.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
