Kulikov v. Kane

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 . That the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody is dismissed without prejudice as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/10/09. (DMT, )

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Andrew Vladimirovich Kulikov, vs. Petitioner, Katrina Kane, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-0923-PHX-PGR (MHB) ORDER Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Burns notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that this action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, should be dismissed as moot as requested by the petitioner (see doc. #11, entitled "Notice to Dismiss Case"), inasmuch as the petitioner was released from immigration custody under an order of supervision on July 17, 2009 (see doc, #9, entitled Suggestion of Mootness). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. #12) is accepted and adopted by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody is dismissed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 without prejudice as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 10th day of October, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?