Thomas v. CHS et al, No. 2:2009cv00490 - Document 4 (D. Ariz. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER granting 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff is required to pay the $350.00 filing fee. The Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/14/09.(LSP)

Download PDF
Thomas v. CHS et al Doc. 4 1 2 SC WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Robin Lorenzo Thomas, Jr., 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 CHS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 09-0490-PHX-DGC (JRI) ORDER 14 Plaintiff Robin Lorenzo Thomas, Jr., who is confined in the Towers Jail in Phoenix, 15 Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an 16 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.1 (Doc.# 1, 3.)2 The Court will dismiss the 17 Complaint with leave to amend. 18 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 19 Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 21 The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $19.67. The remainder of the fee will be 22 collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount 23 in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate 24 25 26 27 28 1 Many inmates apparently believe that they will receive an immediate payout from a fund established in the class action Hart v. Hill, now Graves v. Arpaio, No. CV 77-0479-PHX-NVW. No such fund exists. The inmates in Graves asked for injunctive relief and not monetary damages. The Court at this time expresses no opinion on whether Plaintiff*s lawsuit may result in an award of damages. 2 “Doc.#” refers to the docket number of filings in this case. JDDL-K Dockets.Justia.com JDDL-K 1 Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according 2 to the statutory formula. 3 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 4 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against 5 a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 6 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised 7 claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may 8 be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 9 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the 10 allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint 11 before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) 12 (en banc). The Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This 13 type of advice “would undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler 14 v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide 15 whether the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff’s Complaint 16 will be dismissed for failure to state a claim with leave to amend because the Complaint may 17 possibly be saved by amendment. 18 III. Complaint 19 Plaintiff alleges two counts regarding medical care and conditions of confinement. 20 Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Correctional Health Services (CHS) and Maricopa County 21 Sheriff’s Office (MCSO). Plaintiff seeks compensatory relief. 22 IV. Failure to State a Claim 23 To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the 24 conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state 25 law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v. 26 Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he 27 suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must 28 allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. -2- 1 2 A. 3 Plaintiff names MCSO and CHS as Defendants; however, they are not proper 4 defendants. In Arizona, the responsibility for operating jails and caring for prisoners is 5 placed by law upon the sheriff, see A.R.S. §§ 11-441(A)(5), 31-101, while the responsibility 6 for providing medical care for prisoners is placed by law on the county, see A.R.S. §§ 11- 7 251(8), 11-291(A). MCSO is simply an administrative creation of the sheriff to allow him 8 to carry out his statutory duties and is not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. 9 Similarly, CHS is an administrative agency of Maricopa County to allow it to carry out its 10 JDDL-K Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). MCSO and CHS statutory duties, and is not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. 11 Even if Plaintiff’s allegations are construed as being brought against Maricopa County 12 rather than CHS, he fails to state a claim. A municipality, such as Maricopa County, may not 13 be held liable unless its policy or custom caused the constitutional injury. See Leatherman 14 v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 166 (1993); 15 Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978). Thus, a municipality may not be 16 sued solely because an injury was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. 17 County of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). Rather, the municipality is 18 liable only when the execution of its policy or custom inflicts the constitutional injury. Id.; 19 Miranda v. City of Cornelius, 429 F.3d 858, 868 (9th Cir. 2005). Therefore, a plaintiff 20 cannot state a § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant unless he alleges that the 21 municipal defendant maintained a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury 22 and explains how such policy or custom caused his injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 F.3d 23 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant to Fed. 24 R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). Because Plaintiff fails to allege that any constitutional violation was the 25 result of a custom or policy of CHS, or alternatively, the County, Plaintiff fails to state a 26 claim against either. 27 B. Medical Care 28 Plaintiff alleges that he received constitutionally inadequate medical care. To state -3- JDDL-K 1 a claim for denial of constitutionally adequate medical care, a plaintiff must allege facts to 2 support that he has or had a serious medical need and that a particular defendant acted with 3 deliberate indifference to that need. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-05 (1976); Lolli 4 v. County of Orange, 351 F.3d 410, 418-19 (9th Cir. 2003). To allege a serious medical 5 need, a plaintiff must set forth facts to support that the “failure to treat a prisoner’s condition 6 could result in further significant injury or the ‘unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.’” 7 Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 8 1050, 1059 (9th Cir. 1991), overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs, Inc. v. Miller, 104 9 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc)). A plaintiff must also allege facts to support that a 10 defendant was deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. “Deliberate indifference 11 is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004). 12 Deliberate indifference may occur if “prison officials deny, delay or intentionally interfere 13 with medical treatment.” Hutchinson v. United States, 838 F.2d 390, 394 (9th Cir.1988). 14 Mere negligence, however, “in diagnosing or treating a medical condition, without more, 15 does not violate a prisoner’s Eighth Amendment rights.” Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1132 (quoting 16 Hutchinson, 838 F.2d at 394). Further, a delay in receiving medical care, without more, is 17 insufficient to state a claim against a jailor for deliberate indifference unless the plaintiff can 18 show that the delay in treatment harmed him. Shapley v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’ 19 rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). A difference in medical opinion also does not amount 20 to deliberate indifference. See Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1058. Rather, to prevail on a claim 21 involving choices between alternative courses of treatment, a prisoner must show that the 22 chosen course was medically unacceptable under the circumstances and was chosen in 23 conscious disregard of an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health. Id. Similarly, differences 24 in judgment between an inmate and prison medical personnel regarding appropriate medical 25 diagnosis or treatment are not enough to state a deliberate indifference claim. Sanchez v. 26 Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). 27 In Count I, Plaintiff alleges that he complained to “CHS” for days and then weeks 28 about pain in his foot. Unnamed staff continually delayed his medical appointments. It was -4- 1 not until Plaintiff went to Maricopa County Hospital to have stitches removed from his face 2 that a physician examined his foot and removed a toenail. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered 3 pain due to the delay in getting his foot examined and the necessity to remove his toe nail. 4 In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that after his return to the jail, unidentified jail staff failed to 5 comply with medical instructions to provide him clean socks every day while his toe healed. 6 While Plaintiff sufficiently alleges that he had serious medical need and that he was delayed 7 in receiving prompt medical care, Plaintiff fails to allege that he was denied such care 8 pursuant to policy, practice or custom of the County or CHS. For that reason, Plaintiff fails 9 to state a claim against the County or CHS for deliberate indifference to his serious medical 10 JDDL-K needs. 11 D. Conditions of Confinement 12 Plaintiff also alleges that his foot became infected because the cleaning supplies used 13 at the jail did not kill the germs that caused the infection and unidentified staff refused to 14 provide bleach for that purpose. A pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional conditions 15 of confinement arises from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment while a 16 convicted inmate’s claims for unconstitutional conditions arises from the Eighth Amendment 17 prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 537 18 (1979); Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998). Nevertheless, the same 19 standards are applied. See Frost, 152 F.3d at 1128. To state a claim for unconstitutional 20 conditions, a plaintiff must allege an objectively “sufficiently serious” deprivation that results 21 in the denial of “the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 22 U.S. 825, 834 (1994); Allen v. Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082, 1087 (9th Cir. 1994); Johnson v. Lewis, 23 217 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2000); see Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 24 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002). These are “deprivations of essential food, medical care, or 25 sanitation” or “other conditions intolerable for prison confinement.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 26 452 U.S. 337, 348 (1981). “‘The circumstances, nature, and duration of a deprivation of [] 27 necessities must be considered in determining whether a constitutional violation has 28 occurred.’” Hearns v. Terhune, 413, F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Johnson, 217 -5- JDDL-K 1 F.3d at 731). Thus, whether conditions of confinement rise to the level of a constitutional 2 violation may depend, in part, on the duration of an inmate’s exposure to those conditions. 3 Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 4 678, 686-87 (1978)). Therefore, to state a claim for denial of basic necessities or other 5 unconstitutional conditions, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that he is incarcerated 6 under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834. A plaintiff must 7 also allege facts to support that a defendant had a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., 8 that the official acted with deliberate indifference to inmate health or safety. Id. at 837. In 9 defining “deliberate indifference” in the jail context, the Supreme Court has imposed a 10 subjective test: “the official must both be aware of the facts from which the inference could 11 be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” 12 Id. A plaintiff must also allege how he was injured by the alleged unconstitutional 13 conditions. See, e.g., Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 349 (1996) (doctrine of standing 14 requires that claimant have suffered or will imminently suffer actual harm); Caswell v. 15 Calderon, 363 F.3d 832, 836 (9th Cir. 2004) (case-or-controversy requirement means that 16 plaintiff must have an actual or threatened injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be 17 redressed by a favorable judicial decision). 18 Plaintiff speculates that he developed an infection as a result of a failure to provide 19 bleach or other disinfectants to inmates. Plaintiff does not allege facts to support any 20 connection between the injury to his toe and the lack of disinfectants. He also fails to allege 21 facts to support that any failure to provide such cleaning materials rendered his conditions 22 of confinement unconstitutional. Further, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to connect the denial 23 of cleaning supplies to a named Defendant or to allege facts to support there was a policy to 24 deny adequate cleaning supplies. Finally, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that 25 disinfectants were denied to inmates despite knowledge that such denial posed a substantial 26 risk to inmate health or safety. For these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for 27 unconstitutional conditions of confinement. 28 / / / -6- 1 JDDL-K V. Leave to Amend 2 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state 3 a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first 4 amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail 5 Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails 6 to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this 7 action without further notice to Plaintiff. 8 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 9 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 10 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 11 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 12 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 13 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 14 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as 15 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original 16 complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 17 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). 18 VI. Warnings 19 A. Release 20 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. 21 Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay 22 the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result 23 in dismissal of this action. 24 B. Address Changes 25 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 26 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 27 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 28 action. -7- 1 C. 2 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 3 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice 4 to Plaintiff. 5 D. 6 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails 7 to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 8 dismissal will count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 9 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 10 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior 11 occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a 12 court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, 13 or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under 14 imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Possible “Strike” 15 E. 16 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 17 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 18 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the 19 Court). 20 IT IS ORDERED: 21 22 23 24 25 JDDL-K Copies (1) Possible Dismissal Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed with the Complaint, is granted. (Doc.# 3.) (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $19.67. (3) The Complaint (doc.# 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 26 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance 27 with this Order. 28 (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of -8- 1 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice 2 that states that the dismissal counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3 4 5 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. DATED this 14th day of April, 2009. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K -9- Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 3/9/07 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ) , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: at . The first Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: at . The second Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: at . The third Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.