Mendenhall et al v. Blackmun et al, No. 2:2009cv00298 - Document 117 (S.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT stating this action is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims other than the state-law aspects of the declaratory judgment claim in Count Five of the amended complaint, which is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7; 1367(c)(3). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, judgment in favor of Andrew Cromer, Henrietta Blackmun against Amazing Grace Bed & Breakfast, Linda Mendenhall, Stanford Mendenhall on all claims. JUDGMENT in favor of City of Camden Zoni ng Board, City of Camden, AL against Amazing Grace Bed & Breakfast, Linda Mendenhall, Stanford Mendenhall on all claims except the state-law aspects of the declaratory judgment claim in Count Five of the amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/25/2011. Copies to parties. (mpp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mendenhall et al v. Blackmun et al Doc. 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION AMAZING GRACE BED & BREAKFAST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAYOR HENRIETTA BLACKMUN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 09-0298-WS-N ) ) ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court’s orders of February 23, 2010, January 12, 2011, and February 25, 2011, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims other than the state-law aspects of the declaratory judgment claim in Count Five of the amended complaint, which is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants Mayor Henrietta Blackmun and City Attorney Andrew Cromer and against plaintiffs Amazing Grace Bed & Breakfast, Stanford Mendenhall and Linda Mendenhall on all claims. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants City of Camden and City of Camden Adjustment Board and against plaintiffs Amazing Grace Bed & Breakfast, Stanford Mendenhall and Linda Mendenhall on all claims except the state-law aspects of the declaratory judgment claim in Count Five of the amended complaint. DONE this 25th day of February, 2011. s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
