Thomas v. All In Credit Union, No. 1:2023cv00215 - Document 28 (S.D. Ala. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, 23 Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED. Dft's 15 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED, & this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as set out. All remaining motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 1/25/24. (tot)

Download PDF
Thomas v. All In Credit Union Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. ALL IN CREDIT UNION, Defendant. CIV. ACT. NO. 1:23-cv-215-TFM-B MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On December 7, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommends the Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) be granted and this case dismissed with prejudice. See Doc. 23. Plaintiff Michael Thomas timely filed his objections and the Defendant All In Credit Union filed their response. See Docs. 24, 26. Plaintiff also filed an unsolicited reply to the Defendant’s response on objections, but the Court considered them as part of its review. See Doc. 27. The Court has reviewed the objections and determined that they do not raise specific objections, but rather are simply reiterating the same points raised by the amended complaint. Therefore, the objections are OVERRULED. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 15, filed 7/24/23) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any remaining motions are DENIED as moot. Final judgment will issue separately pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of January, 2024. /s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.