Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al, No. 7:2016cv00863 - Document 75 (N.D. Ala. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/13/20158. (KAM)

Download PDF
Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al Doc. 75 FILED 2018 Dec-13 PM 04:37 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION HELENE MICHEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ) FCI, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) 7:16-cv-00863-RDP-HNJ MEMORANDUM OPINION The Magistrate Judge filed a report on November 20, 2018, recommending the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 74). Although the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court and the time to file objections has expired. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 57), is due to be granted and this action is due Dockets.Justia.com to be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 68) is due to be DENIED. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this December 13, 2018. _________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.