Frazier v. Snider et al, No. 1:2022cv01416 - Document 15 (N.D. Ala. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and accepts his recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation, the Court grants Mr. Snider's motion to dismiss. By separate order, the Court will dismiss this action because it is moot; Mr. Frazier already has received the relief he sought in his petition. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 4/12/2023. (DNW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Frazier v. Snider et al Doc. 15 FILED 2023 Apr-12 AM 11:13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT WILLIAM FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. SEAN SNIDER, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:22-cv-1416-MHH-GMB MEMORANDUM OPINION The Magistrate Judge has entered a report (Doc. 14) in which he determined that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Robert William Frazier (Doc. 1) now is moot. Mr. Frazier did not respond to the defendant’s argument that his petition is moot, and the Court has not received objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report. Having reviewed the report and the materials supporting the defendant’s motion to dismiss, (Docs. 12, 12-1), the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and accepts his recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation, the Court grants Mr. Snider’s motion to dismiss. By separate order, the Court will dismiss this action because it is moot; Mr. Frazier already has received the relief he sought in his petition. DONE and ORDERED this April 12, 2023. _________________________________ MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
