-TFM Alexander Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lee County Board of Education et al, No. 3:2011cv00154 - Document 24 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, the court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that all pending m otions are denied as moot; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
-TFM Alexander Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lee County Board of Education et al Doc. 24 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION ALEXANDER CONTRACTING CO., ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LEE COUNTY BOARD OF ) EDUCATION and STEPHEN ) NOWLIN, in his official ) capacity as Lee County ) Superintendent of Education ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv154-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 49 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and the case reinstated or the Dockets.Justia.com settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.