Lawing v. United States of America (INMATE3), No. 3:2011cv00103 - Document 13 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation 11 is adopted. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is denied as time-barred.It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed.. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/28/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF

Lawing v. United States of America (INMATE3) Doc. 13 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION LOYD FRANK LAWING, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv103-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is adopted. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.