Hatfield v. Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc. (MAG+), No. 3:2011cv00053 - Document 72 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation 70 is adopted. (2) Defendant's motion for summ ary judgment 49 is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The cle rk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/26/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
Hatfield v. Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc. (MAG+) Doc. 72 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION AKILAH E. HATFIELD, Plaintiff, v. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF ALABAMA, INC., etc., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv53-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 70) is adopted. (2) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 49) is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.