Short v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3), No. 3:2010cv00832 - Document 29 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 25 Recommendation is adopted. (2) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are tax ed against petitioner for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/26/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Short v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 29 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION ANGELO B. SHORT, Petitioner, v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv832-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is adopted. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
