Belton v. Russell County Board of Education et al (MAG+), No. 3:2010cv00814 - Document 124 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Marilyn Belton's 117 & 121 Objections are overruled; (2) Dft Lalanya Almesha Ramsey's 118 Objections are overruled; (3) The Magistrate Judge's [115 ] & 119 Recommendations are adopted; (4) Plf Belton's 106 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; (5) Dft Ramsey's 101 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; (6) Dfts Russell County Board of Education, Lillian Baker, and Marcia Johnson 's 101 , 102 , & 104 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted; (7) Judgment is entered favor of dfts Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson and against plf Belton on plf Belton's remaining retaliation claims, with plf Bel ton taking nothing by her complaint as to these dfts on her remaining retaliation claims; further ORDERED that dfts Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson are terminated as parties; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to th e magistrate judge as to plf Belton's remaining retaliation claims against dft Ramsey; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/26/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Belton v. Russell County Board of Education et al (MAG+) Doc. 124 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION MARILYN BELTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv814-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Marilyn Belton’s objections (doc. nos. 117 and 121) are overruled. (2) Defendant Lalanya Almesha Ramsey’s objections (doc. no. 118) are overruled. (3) The magistrate judge’s recommendations (doc. nos. 115 and 119) are adopted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Plaintiff Belton’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 106) is denied. (5) Defendant Ramsey’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 101) is denied. (6) Defendants Russell County Board of Education, Lillian Baker, and Marcia Johnson’s motions for summary judgment (doc. nos. 101, 102, and 104) are granted. (7) Judgment is entered favor of defendants Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson and against plaintiff Belton on plaintiff Belton’s remaining retaliation claims, with plaintiff Belton taking nothing by her complaint as to these defendants on her remaining retaliation claims. It is further ORDERED that defendants Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson are terminated as parties. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge as to plaintiff Belton’s remaining retaliation claims against defendant Ramsey. 2 The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
