Carr v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2), No. 3:2006cv00547 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2006)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT that 5 Objections are overruled; The 4 Report and Recommendation is adopted; The 1 Petition for Writ of habeas Corpus is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Co sts are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/30/06. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, ) Modified on 7/20/2006 to correct title of order (cb, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carr v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 7 Case 3:06-cv-00547-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TERRY LEON CARR, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv547-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 5) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied because the required permission has Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-00547-MHT-DRB not been Document 7 obtained from Filed 06/30/2006 the Page 2 of 2 Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 30th day of June, 2006. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
