Hudson v. FPC Montgomery et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2012cv00625 - Document 49 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) the defs' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that the defendants seek dismissal o f this case due to Hudsons failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to him through the BOP before filing this federal civil action ; (2) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Hudson's failure to exhaust the administrative remedies previously available to him through the BOP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/1/2015. (djy, )

Download PDF
Hudson v. FPC Montgomery et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 49 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DETRINE HUDSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. FPC Montgomery, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv625-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On April 2, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 47). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Hudson’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to him through the BOP before filing this federal civil action. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Hudson’s failure to exhaust the administrative remedies previously available to him through the BOP. Dockets.Justia.com Done this the 1st day of June, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.