Anderson v. Lockett et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2011cv00692 - Document 4 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Anderson's failure to provide the court with necessary financial information in compliance with the orders of this court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/18/2011. (dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CURTIS L. ANDERSON, #141707, Plaintiff, v. LT. LOCKETT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2;11cv692-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On September 28, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 3). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Anderson s failure to provide the court with necessary financial information in compliance with the orders of this court. Done this the 18th day of October, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
