-CSC Yelverton v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2011cv00394 - Document 24 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER as follows: 1) That the 15 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) That the plf's claims against the Covington County Jail be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 USC § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i); 3) That the plf's claims against Covington County, Alabama and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 4) Dfts Covington County Ja il, Covington County, Alabama, and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED as dfts in this cause of action; 5) That this case, with respect to the plf's claims against the remaining dfts be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/6/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION FREDDIE L. YELVERTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DENNIS MEEKS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv394-TMH OPINION and ORDER On July 11, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed (doc. # 15). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. That the plaintiff s claims against the Covington County Jail be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. That the plaintiff s claims against Covington County, Alabama and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 4. Defendants Covington County Jail, Covington County, Alabama, and Southern Health Partners be and are hereby DISMISSED as defendants in this cause of action. 5. That this case, with respect to the plaintiff s claims against the remaining defendants be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Done this the 6 th day of September, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs ________________________________________ TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
