-SRW Ridley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2011cv00377 - Document 17 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION; it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 15 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) The 28 USC § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief, as amended (Doc. Nos. 1 and 3 ), are DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; 2) The motions seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. Nos. 10 , 11 , and 13 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/9/2011. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION EDWARD RIDLEY, #276808, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv377-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On July 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 15). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief, as amended (Doc. Nos. 1 and 3), are DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 2. The motions seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, and 13) are DENIED as moot. Done this the 9 th day of August, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs ________________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
