Franklin v. Parnell et al (MAG+), No. 2:2010cv00495 - Document 50 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf's 47 objections are overruled; (2) the Mag Judge's 45 report and recommendation is adopted; (3) plf's 41 motion for summary judgment is denied; (4) defs' 26 motion for summary judgment is granted; (5) judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Franklin v. Parnell et al (MAG+) Doc. 50 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION NUE CHEER FRANKLIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JUSTIN MATTHEW PARNELL, ) ESQ., individually and in ) his capacity as employee ) of Parnell and Crum, P.A., ) and PARNELL AND CRUM, P.A., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv495-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 47) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 45) is adopted. (3) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 41) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 26) is granted. (5) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 7th day of January, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.