-WC Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+), No. 2:2010cv00287 - Document 45 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/2011. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-WC Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+) Doc. 45 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DAWN FRAZIER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COLONIAL BANK, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv287-MHT (WO) OPINION Plaintiff Dawn Frazier filed this lawsuit against defendants Colonial Bank, Branch Banking and Trust Company (also known as BB&T), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (also known as FDIC), as receiver for Colonial employee of Bank. Colonial Frazier Bank, claims she that, was while an subjected to retaliation, a hostile-work environment, race and gender discrimination, and maternity-leave discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601- Dockets.Justia.com 2654). This matter is now before the court on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the FDIC s motion to substitute party should be granted; BB&T s motions to dismiss denied as moot; the FDIC s motion to dismiss granted; and this case dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. filed objections to the recommendation. Frazier has After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that Frazier s objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge s recommendation adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
