-CSC Hunter et al v. Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc., No. 2:2009cv01155 - Document 100 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the defendant's 47 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) the 72 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgmen t by plaintiffs is denied; (3) judgment is entered in favor of defendant Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. and against the plaintiffs, with the plaintiffs taking nothing by their complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against the plaintiff s, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/25/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates Jury Trial 12/05/2011).(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CSC Hunter et al v. Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. Doc. 100 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JEWEL HUNTER, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. SANTA FE PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv1155-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. (Doc. No. 47) is granted. (2) The partial motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Jewel Hunter, Carol Adams, Judith Dashner, Karen Didorek, Marilyn Revalee, Eddie Bradshaw, Linda Forbes, William Tharpe, John Thompson, William Dover, Cynthia O’Bryant, Melanie Griffith, John H. Crawford, Dockets.Justia.com Jr., Gregory Davis, Amy J. Hanbury, and Estelle Imfinger, as administratrix of Huie Infinger’s estate (Doc. No. 72) is denied. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Santa Fe Protective Services, Inc. and against the plaintiffs, with the plaintiffs taking nothing by their complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plaintiffs, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 25th day of October, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
