-CSC Duff v. Daniels (INMATE2), No. 2:2009cv00523 - Document 23 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER; that 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the Defendants motion for summary judgment 11 be and is hereby GRANTED. 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 6/16/2011. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO RODREGIS DUFF, #186551, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN DANIELS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv523-ID ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On May 26, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 22). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the Defendant s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11) be and is hereby GRANTED. 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff for which execution may issue. Done this the 16 th day of June, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
