Leggitte v. Shinseki (MAG+), No. 2:2009cv00477 - Document 90 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf's 82 Objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 77 Recommendation is adopted; (3) Dft's 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) Plf's claim under the Equal Pay Act, 29 USC § 206(d), is dismissed without prejudice; (5) Plf's claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 USC §§ 1981a, 2000e through 2000e-17, is dismissed with pre judice; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/21/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Leggitte v. Shinseki (MAG+) Doc. 90 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RICKY B. LEGGITTE, SR., Plaintiff, v. ERIC SHINSEKI, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv477-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 82) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 77) is adopted. (3) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 41) is granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Plaintiff’s claim under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d), is dismissed without prejudice. (5) Plaintiff’s claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e through 2000e-17, is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. case is closed. DONE, this the 21st day of January, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
