-CSC Glanton v. Michelin North America USA(MAG+), No. 1:2011cv00260 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION stating that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's 24 recommendation, to which there are no objections, should be adopted. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/1/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION LESSIE GLANTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA USA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv260-MHT (WO) OPINION Plaintiff Lessie Glanton filed this lawsuit charging defendant Michelin North America, USA, with employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Glanton s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. After an independent and de novo review of the the record, court concludes that the magistrate judge s recommendation, to which there are no objections, should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 1st day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
