FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WETUMPKA, ALABAMA v. Sewell, 79 B.R. 36 (N.D. Ala. 1984)
February 29, 1984
v.
William L. SEWELL, Dorothy J. Sewell and Ed W. Harwell, Trustee, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, E.D.
Alan D. Levine, Levine & Levine, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.
Ed W. Harwell, Anniston, Ala., pro se.
Prior report: Bkrtcy., 32 B.R. 116:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CLEMON, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in Southtrust Bank of Alabama v. Grady Lee Black, et al., CV No. 83-HM-2101-W [Available on WESTLAW, DCT database], it is hereby *37 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED and DECLARED as follows:
1. Appellant FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WETUMPKA, ALABAMA, was not required to file a financing statement in order to perfect its purchase money security interest in the mobile home involved in this case.
2. The judgment appealed from is hereby REVERSED, with directions that the Bankruptcy Court shall henceforth recognize the security interest of First National Bank of Wetumpka in the 1974 Vagabond Mobile Home as a perfected security interest.
3. The costs of this action are hereby taxed against the defendant trustee, ED W. HARWELL, in his representative capacity.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
