Slater Steels Corp. v. United States, No. 02-00551 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 17, 2005.

Download PDF

Slip Op. 07-34 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : SLATER STEELS CORPORATION, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : Before: Judith M. Barzilay, Judge ____________________________________: Consol Ct. No. 02-00551 ____________________________________ : VIRAJ GROUP, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : : SLATER STEELS CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendant-Intervenors. : ___________________________________ : JUDGMENT ORDER [Commerce s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand II reinstated.] Dated: March 12, 2007 Collier, Shannon, Scott, PLLC (Robin H. Gilbert), for Plaintiffs and DefendantIntervenors Slater Steels Corp., Carpenter Technology Corporation, Electralloy Corp., and Crucible Specialty Metals Division, Crucible Materials Corp. Consol Ct. No. 02-00551 Page 2 Miller & Chevalier Chartered (Peter J. Koenig), for Plaintiff Viraj Group. (Jeanne E. Davidson), Director; (Stephen C. Tosini), Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice; (Matthew D. Walden), Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of counsel, for Defendant. Pursuant to the holding of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Viraj Group v. United States, Slip Op. 2006-1158 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2007), it is hereby ORDERED that the Department of Commerce s Final Results of Determination Pursuant to Remand (Dep t Commerce May 7, 2004) ( Remand Results II ), produced in response to this court s decision in Slater Steels Corp. v. United States, 28 CIT __, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (2004), is reinstated; and it is further ORDERED that this case is dismissed. March 12, 2007 Dated:________________________ New York, NY /s/ Judith M. Barzilay __________________________ Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.