AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [OPINION - NONPRECEDENTIAL] , No. 17-1999 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A., Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellees ______________________ 2017-1999 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201501804. ______________________ Decided: January 9, 2019 ______________________ MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G. HARDY. DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q. SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH. ______________________ AC TECHS. v. AMAZON.COM 2 Before MOORE, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. STOLL, Circuit Judge. Before us is AC Technologies S.A.’s appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that all claims of U.S. Patent 8,656,125 are unpatentable. On appeal, AC raises arguments substantially identical to those we rejected today in AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 18-1433. For the reasons explained in that decision, we affirm the Board. AFFIRMED COSTS Costs to Appellees.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.