PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. XILINX, INC. , No. 16-2323 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant v. XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-2323 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.