GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , No. 12-1676 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, (doing business as Verizon Wireless) AND ALLTEL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND AT&T MOBILITY LLC, (doing business as Cingular Wireless), Defendant-Appellee, AND SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., AND NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2012-1676 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 07-CV-4222, Judge Mary L. Cooper. ______________________ JUDGMENT _____________________ JOHN F. WARD, Ward & Zinna, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was MICHAEL J. ZINNA. Of counsel on the brief were ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, REGIS C. WORLEY, JR., and CODY R. LEJEUNE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Down LLP, of San Diego, California. DOUGLAS M. KUBEHL, Baker Botts, L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SAMARA KLINE and CHRISTA BROWNSANFORD; and RICHARD H. BROWN, III, Day Pitney, LLP, of Parsippany, New Jersey for defendant-appellee AT&T Mobility, LLC; and KATHRYN L. CLUNE and CLYDE E. FINDLEY, Crowell & Moring, LLP, of Washington, DC, and KAREN A. CONFOY, Sterns & Weinroth, P.C., of Trenton, New Jersey, for Defendants-appellees, Sprint Spectrum L.P., et al.; JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL and MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, and JAMES P. FLYNN, Epstein Becker & Green, of Newark, New Jersey, for defendants-appellees, Cellco Partnership, et al.; ROBERT HARKINS, Sedgwick LLP, of San Francisco, California, KIRK R. RUTHENBERG, SNR Denton, US, LLP, of Washington, DC, and ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber, LLC, of Newark, New Jersey, for defendant-appellee T-Mobile, USA, Inc. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 17, 2013 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
