SYNOPSYS, INC. v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD. , No. 12-1522 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION ------------------------SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. --------------------RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, v. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC., MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH, INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., Defendants. ______________________ 2012-1522 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge James Ware. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN. KENNETH W. BROTHERS, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were GARY M. HOFFMAN; and KRISTA M. CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H. RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: es). PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit JudgAFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 12, 2012 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
