PANDUIT CORP. v. ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. , No. 12-1435 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Teresa Stanek Rea, ACTING DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Cross Appellant. ______________________ 2012-1435, -1436 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,412. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O MEARA, and ERIC D. MOREHOUSE. COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor. PHILIP P. CASPERS, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY A. LINDQUIST, SAMUEL A. HAMER, and JOSEPH W. WINKELS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 12, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.