THERASENSE, INC. V. BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO. , No. 12-1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 17, 2012.
Download PDF
Case: 12-1365 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2012 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit THERASENSE, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS ABBOTT DIABETES CARE, INC.) AND ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY AND NOVA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants, AND BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, Defendant. 2012-1504 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in consolidated case nos. 04-CV-2123, 04-CV-3327, 04-CV-3732, and 05-CV-3117, Judge William H. Alsup. THERASENSE, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS ABBOTT DIABETES CARE, INC.) AND ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Case: 12-1365 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2012 THERASENSE, INC. V. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY 2 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY AND NOVA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1365, -1503 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in consolidated case nos. 04-CV-2123, 04-CV-3327, 04-CV-3732, and 05-CV-3117, Judge William H. Alsup. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Therasense, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories's unopposed motion to withdraw appeals 2012-1365 and 2012-1503, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. missed. The appeals are dis- Case: 12-1365 3 Document: 34 Page: 3 Filed: 10/23/2012 THERASENSE, INC. V. BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1365 and 2012-1503. (3) The revised official caption in 2012-1504 is reflected above. Becton's principal brief in 2012-1504 is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s25 Issued As A lVUlll;date (For 2012-1365 and 2012-1503 Only): OCT Z j 2012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
