Transm Access Plcy v. FERC, No. 97-1715 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 30, 2000.
United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit
No. 97-1715 September Term, 2000
Transmission Access Policy Study Group, et al., Filed On: November 14, 2000 Petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent
Vermont Department of Public Service, et al., Intervenors
and consolidated cases
Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Before: Sentelle, Randolph, and Tatel, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Court that the opinion filed herein on June 30, 2000, be, and it hereby is, amended as follows:
On page 25, line 3, of the slip opinion, delete the word "FERC" and insert in lieu thereof the word "Congress."
On page 47, last paragraph, delete the following: "Because FERC-jurisdictional utilities are no longer subject to sections 211 and 212, this argument relates only to those situations in which FERC orders nonjurisdictional transmitting utilities to wheel under section 211 and these utilities then seek to recover stranded costs in their transmission rates. See 18 C.F.R. 35.26(c)(1)(vi)-(vii)."
Per curiam For the Court: Mark J. Langer, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk
No. 97-1715 September Term, 2000
Transmission Access Policy Study Group, et al., Filed On: November 14, 2000 Petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent
Vermont Department of Public Service, et al., Intervenors
and consolidated cases
Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Before: Sentelle, Randolph, and Tatel, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Court that the opinion filed herein on June 30, 2000, be, and it hereby is, amended as follows:
On page 25, line 3, of the slip opinion, delete the word "FERC" and insert in lieu thereof the word "Congress."
On page 47, last paragraph, delete the following: "Because FERC-jurisdictional utilities are no longer subject to sections 211 and 212, this argument relates only to those situations in which FERC orders nonjurisdictional transmitting utilities to wheel under section 211 and these utilities then seek to recover stranded costs in their transmission rates. See 18 C.F.R. 35.26(c)(1)(vi)-(vii)."
Per curiam For the Court: Mark J. Langer, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
