Sasol N America Inc, et al v. NLRB, No. 00-1525 (D.C. Cir. 2002)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 8, 2002.
United States Court of Appeals
For The District of Columbia Circuit
No. 00-1525 September Term, 2001
Filed On: January 25, 2002 [653244]
Sasol North America Inc.,
Petitioner
v.
National Labor Relations Board,
Respondent
BEFORE: Sentelle and Rogers, Circuit Judges; and Williams, Senior Circuit
Judge
O R D E R
It is, ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the opinion filed January 8,
2002, be amended as follows:
(1) The last sentence of the opening paragraph "We therefore reverse and
remand for further proceedings." be deleted; and insert in lieu thereof,
"We therefore grant the petition for review, deny the cross-application for
enforcement and remand for further proceedings."
(2) The last paragraph of the opinion "We reverse the Board's decision and
remand the case to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion." be
deleted; and insert in lieu thereof,
"We grant the petition for review, deny the cross-application for enforcement,
and remand the case to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
Deputy Clerk
For The District of Columbia Circuit
No. 00-1525 September Term, 2001
Filed On: January 25, 2002 [653244]
Sasol North America Inc.,
Petitioner
v.
National Labor Relations Board,
Respondent
BEFORE: Sentelle and Rogers, Circuit Judges; and Williams, Senior Circuit
Judge
O R D E R
It is, ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the opinion filed January 8,
2002, be amended as follows:
(1) The last sentence of the opening paragraph "We therefore reverse and
remand for further proceedings." be deleted; and insert in lieu thereof,
"We therefore grant the petition for review, deny the cross-application for
enforcement and remand for further proceedings."
(2) The last paragraph of the opinion "We reverse the Board's decision and
remand the case to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion." be
deleted; and insert in lieu thereof,
"We grant the petition for review, deny the cross-application for enforcement,
and remand the case to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.