MASOUMEH MOHAJER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., No. 15-55122 (9th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 27 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MASOUMEH MOHAJER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-55122 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03085-DSF-FFM MEMORANDUM* J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Company; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 14, 2017** Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Masoumeh Mohajer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We do not consider Mohajer’s federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings because Mohajer does not challenge the district court’s dismissal of those claims in her opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (court does not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief). We reject as unsupported by the record Mohajer’s contention that opposing counsel filed a proposed order with the district court without a certificate of service. Defendants’ September 11, 2015 motion for judicial notice is denied as unnecessary. AFFIRMED. 2 15-55122

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.