USA V. DAVID MEDNANSKY, No. 13-55662 (9th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 4, 2015.
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 10 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 13-55662 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01307-MMABGS v. DAVID MEDNANSKY, individually and MARTINE MEDNANSKY, individually. ORDER Defendants - Appellants. Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. The memorandum disposition filed on September 4, 2015, 2015 WL 5167842, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 13, the text <83.3(g)(1)> is deleted and replaced with <83.3(f)(1)>. The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied. No further petitions shall be entertained.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
