ROBERT BLUE V. HOWARD SKOLNIK, No. 12-17394 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 03 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT BLUE, No. 12-17394 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00010-LRHVPC v. HOWARD SKOLNIK; et al., MEMORANDUM * Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 28, 2013 ** Before: O SCANNLAIN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Plaintiff Robert Blue appeals pro se the district court s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292(a)(1), and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review). AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.