FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK V. SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP, No. 12-17241 (9th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 8, 2016.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor, No. 12-17241 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02579HRH FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee. IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor, SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 12-17327 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02579HRH 2 IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor, No. 13-16164 D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02700HRH FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP, Defendant-Appellee. IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor, No. 13-16180 D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02700HRH SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP, Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER v. FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee. Filed April 21, 2016 Before: Alex Kozinski, Richard A. Paez, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges. IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING 3 ORDER The slip opinion filed on April 8, 2016, is hereby amended as follows: 1. On page 6 of the slip opinion, line 4, change <section 1325(a)(5)(B) of the Code> to <section 1129(b) of the Code>. 2. On page 11 of the slip opinion, lines 6–7, change <11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)> to <11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)>. 3. On page 25 of the slip opinion, lines 1–7, change <Under section 1325(a)(5) of the Code, a plan’s treatment of a secured claim can be confirmed if one of three conditions is satisfied: the creditor accepts the plan, the debtor surrenders the property, or the debtor invokes the cram down power. Rash, 520 U.S. at 957.> to <Under section 1129(b) of the Code, a plan can be confirmed even without the consent of all impaired classes of creditors if the debtor invokes the cram down power.>. With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED as moot. Future petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed from this Order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
