Tobeler v. Colvin, No. 12-16392 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff appealed the district court's order denying his motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412. The court concluded that the underlying agency action lacked a reasonable basis in law because the Social Security ALJ disregarded competent lay witness evidence on plaintiff's symptoms without comment. The court concluded that, because the ALJ disregarded competent lay witness evidence without comment, the position of the United States in the underlying action was not substantially justified. Because the government's underlying position was not substantially justified, the court awarded fees, even if the government's litigation position may have been justified. Therefore, plaintiff was entitled to an award of attorney's fees. Accordingly, the court reversed and remanded.
Court Description: Equal Access to Justice Act / Attorney’s Fees. The panel reversed the district court’s order denying a claimant’s motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The panel held that the underlying federal agency action lacked a reasonable basis in law because the Social Security administrative law judge disregarded competent lay witness evidence without comment. The panel also held that the position of the United States in the underlying action was not substantially justified, and the claimant was entitled to an award of attorney’s fees. The panel held that a fee award was appropriate even if the government’s litigation position may have been justified because the government’s underlying position was not substantially justified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.