BARRY SCHOTZ V. CRAIG APKER, No. 11-17096 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 31 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARRY R. SCHOTZ, No. 11-17096 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-00703-FRZ v. MEMORANDUM * CRAIG APKER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 19, 2012 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Barry R. Schotz appeals pro se from the district court s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Schotz contends that the Bureau of Prisons ( BOP ) unlawfully refused his request for a transfer to a Residential Re-entry Center ( RRC ). We review the denial of a section 2241 habeas petition de novo and findings of fact for clear error. See Reynolds v. Thomas, 603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir. 2010). Schotz s contention fails because the district court did not clearly err in concluding that Schotz did not make a direct request for placement in an RRC. In light of this conclusion, we do not reach Schotz s argument that the BOP violated 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) by failing to consider him for RRC placement before the end of his sentence. Schotz s motion to take judicial notice of several documents that he filed with this court is denied, and the government s motion to strike these documents is granted. AFFIRMED. 2 11-17096

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.