KRISTIN PERRY V. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., No. 10-16696 (9th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 4, 2011.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON , in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT , in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. No. 10-16696 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292VRW 2 PERRY V . BROWN LOGAN , in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM , Intervenor-Defendant, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH ; GAIL J. KNIGHT ; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; MARK A. JANSSON ; PROTECT MARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor of No. 11-16577 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292JW ORDER PERRY V . BROWN California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON , in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT , in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN , in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM , Intervenor-Defendant, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH ; GAIL J. KNIGHT ; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; MARK A. JANSSON ; PROTECT MARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. 3 4 PERRY V . BROWN On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed August 6, 2013 Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges. ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court s opinion of June 26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
