John McComish, et al v. Ken Bennett, et al, No. 10-15165 (9th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 23, 2010.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN MCCOMISH; NANCY MCLAIN; TONY BOUIE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KEN BENNETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arizona; GARY SCARAMAZZO; ROYANN J. PARKER; JEFFREY L. FAIRMAN; LOUIS HOFFMAN; LORI S. DANIELS, in their official capacities as members of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, Defendants-Appellants, and CLEAN ELECTIONS INSTITUTE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor, v. DEAN MARTIN; ROBERT BURNS; RICK MURPHY; ARIZONA FREE ENTERPRISE CLUB S FREEDOM CLUB PAC; ARIZONA TAXPAYERS ACTION COMMITTEE, agent of Taxpayers Action Committee, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees. 10465    No. 10-15165 D.C. No. 2:08- cv-1550 ROS D Ariz., Phoenix 10466 MCCOMISH v. BENNETT JOHN MCCOMISH; NANCY MCLAIN; TONY BOUIE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KEN BENNETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arizona; GARY SCARAMAZZO; ROYANN J. PARKER; JEFFREY L. FAIRMAN; LOUIS HOFFMAN; LORI S. DANIELS, in their official capacities as members of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, Defendants, and CLEAN ELECTIONS INSTITUTE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, v. DEAN MARTIN; ROBERT BURNS; RICK MURPHY; ARIZONA FREE ENTERPRISE CLUB S FREEDOM CLUB PAC; ARIZONA TAXPAYERS ACTION COMMITTEE, agent of Taxpayers Action Committee, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees,   No. 10-15166 DC No. 2:08 cv-1550 ROS D Ariz., Phoenix ORDER  On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States Filed August 10, 2011 MCCOMISH v. BENNETT 10467 Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, A. Wallace Tashima, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges ORDER In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Arizona Free Enterprise Club s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 131 S. Ct. 2806 (2011), the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
