Conn, et al v. City of Reno, et al, No. 07-15572 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 8, 2010.

Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLA CONN and DUSTIN CONN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RENO; RYAN ASHTON; DAVID ROBERTSON, Defendants-Appellees.    No. 07-15572 D.C. No. Cv-05-00595-HDM District of Nevada, Reno ORDER On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed September 6, 2011 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges. ORDER We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081, except that in light of the Supreme Court s decision in Connick v. Thompson, 131 S. Ct. 1350 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court s grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts III(C)(1) and III(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court s decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. 16847

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.