BAUMAN V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP, No. 07-15386 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 6, 2010.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY GRIECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; SILVIA NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO PESCE; MIRTA HAYDEE ARENAS; GRACIELA GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO GIGENA, NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA SCHIAFFO; ELBA LEICHNER; ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE BELMONTE; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARREIRO; ALEJANDRO DAER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 07-15386 D.C. No. CV-04-00194RMW ORDER v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, Defendants-Appellees. Filed February 28, 2014 On Remand From The United States Supreme Court 2 BAUMAN V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges. ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court s opinion of January 14, 2014, as well as the resulting judgment, the district court s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
