linkLine, et al v. SBC California, Inc., et al, No. 05-56023 (9th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; INREACH INTERNET LLC; OM NETWORKS, dba Omsoft Technologies, Inc.; NITELOG, INC., dba Red Shift Internet Services, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific Bell Telephone Company; PACIFIC BELL INTERNET SERVICES; SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 05-56023 D.C. No. CV-03-05265-SVW ORDER ï£¾ On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 9, 2009 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM: In light of the Supreme Court s opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 1109 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision, 4161 4162 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS v. SBC CALIFORNIA including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint. The mandate shall issue forthwith. REMANDED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.